A specific case where rigorous "discourse-based decision support" would have surfaced significant information i.e. the institutional version of "subjective narrative".
"An important caveat to this claim is that while the earlier draft text reveals what parties wanted inserted or taken out, it doesn’t show what all parties thought about every provision. A country would not have been able to articulate an objection if another country already registered a reservation."
How The Rio+20 Text Could Have Been Stronger
by Adam James, Andrew Light, and Gwynne Taraska The final draft text of the Rio+20 Earth Summit agreed on today has disappointed many delegates and activists around the world. Other than the Brazilian…
Post imported by Google+Blog. Created By Daniel Treadwell.